ASSESSMENT THE UNUSED CAPACITY USING TIME DRIVEN ACTIVITY BASED COSTING IN AUTOMOTIVE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY

Authors

  • N.F.A. Ghani Faculty of Manufacturing and Mechatronic Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26600, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • S.N.A.M. Zaini Faculty of Manufacturing and Mechatronic Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26600, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • M.Y. Abu Faculty of Manufacturing and Mechatronic Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26600, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmmst.v4i1.3839

Keywords:

Time driven activity based costing; Costing structure; Automotive industry

Abstract

Automotive Manufacturing Industry usually known implementing all six sigma method and lean manufacturing. However, actual practicality in the world of manufacturing, there are a lot of factors contributes that become the challenge to the ideal of lean production line. Not exclude those factors, there is no methods to identify the possible lost cost by the factors. This research is to identify the used-and un-used capacity exist in production line that considering factors affecting the production line at real time. Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) is identified as one of the powerful tools to analyze the actual condition of production. Cost-driver rate is defined in Phase 3 where the highest capacity cost rate calculated is RM0.67 per minutes which involving Station 3, Station 5, Station 7 and Station 8. The least capacity cost rate is RM0.33 per minutes recorded by Station 0(Preparation), Station 2 and Station 6. Ten time equations for each station at trim line is developed. During the development of time equation, criticality of Station 7 when it became the only station affected with all thirteen factors listed can be seen as station that needed focus for improvement or target for lean manufacturing. In regards of the relevancy of applying Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing, as a whole, TD-ABC can be used to identify the estimation capacity used either over or under-used. Not only un-used capacity is identified, but result shows Station 0 is over-used by 2932 minutes equals to RM967.56. Therefore, based on the result obtained, station with over-used capacity and several stations with under-used capacity gives a clear overview to the management of the company for better investment strategy.

References

H. Muzaimi, S. R. Hamid, and B. C. Chew, “Integrated management system for quality management system accreditation,” Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, pp. 87-99, 2017.

S. Miyajima, S. Yamada, T. Yamada and M. Inoue, “Proposal of a modular design method considering supply chain: comprehensive evaluation by environmental laod, cost, quality and lead time,” Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 119-131, 2019.

T.C. Jones, and D. Dugdale, “The ABC bandwagon and the juggernaut of modernity,” Accounting, Organization and Society, vol. 27, no. 1-2, pp. 121-163, 2002.

S. Alcouffee, B. Nicolas, and L. Yves, ”Actor-networks and the diffusion of management accounting innovations: a comparative study,” Management Accounting Research, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1-17, 2008.

R. Cooper, and R. S. Kaplan, “Activity-based systems: measuring the costs of resource usage,” Accounting Horizons, vol. 6, pp. 1–13, 1992.

P.L. Bescos, E. Cauvin, and M. Gosselin, “Activity based costing and activity-based management: comparison of the practices in Canada and in France,” Comptabilite´, controˆle etaudi, vol. 8, pp. 229–244, 2002.

S.W. Anderson, and S.M. Young, “The impact of contextual and process factors on the evaluation of activity-based costing systems,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 24, pp. 525–559, 1999.

N.N. Nik Mohd Kamil, and M.Y. Abu, “Integration of Mahalanobis-Taguchi System and activity based costing for remanufacturing decision,” Journal of Modern Manufacturing Systems and Technology, vol, 1, pp. 39-51, 2018.

V. Chouhan, G. Soral, and B. Chandra, “Activity based costing model for inventory valuation,” Management Science Letters, vol. 7, pp. 135-144, 2017.

R. Kee, and C. Schmidt, “A comparative analysis of utilizing activity-based costing and the theory of constraint for making product-mix decisions,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1-17, 2000.

T. Stevenson, and D. Cabell, “Integrating transfer pricing policy and activity-based costing,” Journal of International Marketing, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 77-88, 2002.

T. Bjornenak, and F. Mitchell, “The development of activity-based costing journal literature, 1987–2000,” European Accounting Review, vol. 11, pp. 481–508, 2002.

T. Malmi, “Towards explaining activity-based costing failure: accounting and control in decentralized organization,” Management Accounting Research, vol. 8, pp. 459–480, 1997.

M. Gosselin, “A review of activity-based costing: technique, implementation, and consequences,” Handbook of management accounting research, vol. 2, pp. 641–671, 2007.

W.D.J. Cotton, S.M. Jackman, and R.A. Brown, “Note on a New Zealand replication of the Innes et al. UK activity-based costing survey,” Management Accounting Research, vol. 14, pp. 67–72, 2003.

T. Hopper, and M. Major, “Extending institutional analysis through theoretical triangulation: regulation and activity-based costing in Portuguese telecommunications,” European Accounting Review, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 59-97, 2007.

J. Innes, and F. Mitchell, “A survey of activity-based costing in the U.K.’s largest companies,” Management Accounting Research, vol. 6, pp. 137–153, 1995.

T. Malmi, “Activity-based costing diffusion across organizations: an exploratory empirical analysis of Finnish firms Accounting,” Organizations and Society, vol. 24, pp. 649–672, 1999.

J. Innes, F. Mitchell, and D. Sinclair, “Activity-based costing in the U.K.’s largest companies: a comparison of 1994 and 1999 survey results,” Management Accounting Research, vol. 11, pp. 349–362, 2000.

D.E. Akyol, G. Tuncel, and G.M. Bayhan, “A comparative analysis of activity-based costing and traditional costing,” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 3, pp. 44-47, 2005.

R. S. Kaplan, and S. R. Anderson, “Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing,” Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, 2007.

R.S. Kaplan and S.R. Anderson, “Time-driven activity-based costing”, Harvard Bussiness Review, vol. 82, no.11, pp. 131-138, 2004.

M. Wouters, and J. Stecher, “Development of real-time product cost measurement : A case study in a medium-sized manufacturing company,” International Journal Production Economics, vol. 183, pp. 235-244, 2017.

H.M. Asih, K.E. Chong and M. Faishal, “Capacity planning and product allocations under testing time uncertainty in electronic industry,” Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 12, no.1, pp. 103-115, 2018.

S.N.A. Mohd Zaini, and M.Y. Abu, “A review on time-driven activity based costing system in various sectors,” Journal of Modern Manufacturing Systems and Technology, vol. 2, pp. 15-22, 2019.

Downloads

Published

27-03-2020

How to Cite

Ghani, N., Zaini, S., & Abu, M. (2020). ASSESSMENT THE UNUSED CAPACITY USING TIME DRIVEN ACTIVITY BASED COSTING IN AUTOMOTIVE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY. Journal of Modern Manufacturing Systems and Technology, 4(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.15282/jmmst.v4i1.3839

Issue

Section

Articles