Critical lifetime of HDPE pipes through damage and reliability models

Authors

  • F. Majid National Higher School of Electricity and Mechanics (ENSEM), Hassan II Univ. of Casablanca, BP 8118 Oasis, Casablanca, Morocco, Phone: +212663499078
  • M. Elghorba National Higher School of Electricity and Mechanics (ENSEM), Hassan II Univ. of Casablanca, BP 8118 Oasis, Casablanca, Morocco, Phone: +212663499078

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.13.3.2019.02.0428

Keywords:

Life fraction, tensile test, burst test, strain damage and reliability, burst pressure static damage, HDPE pipes

Abstract

Damage models are not directly applicable on high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipes. In this paper, static and strain-unified theory damage models are adapted to fit the HDPE case by substituting the dynamic tests’ endurance limits by preloading simulation through notch and stiffness evaluation. Then, tensile and burst tests are following up to evaluate the specimens’ residual life. Compared to virgin specimens, the rupture limit of old HDPE pipes’ specimens had dropped significantly and their elongation decreased from 275 mm to about 26 mm. The degradation of the seven categories of specimens are different. Indeed, the degradation is too noticeable, disappearance of the plastic phase, for the categories 6 and 7, which are in the bottom of the pipe. Then, a reduced plastic phase on the lateral categories 4 and 5 showing an important impact of degradations. Finally, a larger plastic phase for the categories 1 and 2 taken from the top of the pipe, showing a medium impact of degradation. Thus, the use of the stiffness factor, reflecting the variability of degradation of the different categories of specimens, and the thickness reduction as life fractions for both aged and neat HDPE specimens was possible. The developed strains damage model compared to static burst pressures’ one confirmed the damage stages and the critical life fraction of HDPE pipes. By comparing these models, the drastic change of HDPE pipes’ behavior, from a ductile to a brittle one, have been proved. These findings allowed us to find out the critical life fraction of neat and old HDPE pipes, which has been confirmed by comparing the burst pressure curves of a notched and an old pipe. The presented approach is cost effective allowing a deep analysis of HDPE pipes failure and damage quantification through simply made models based on static tensile and burst test instead of tedious and very costly dynamic ones.

References

Zhang Y, Ben Jar PY. Comparison of Mechanical Properties Between PE80 and PE100 Pipe Materials. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. 2016;25:4326–32.

Christensen RM, Perspective on Materials Failure Theory and Applications, Journal of Applied Mechanics. 2016;83:111001-06.

Alvarado-Contreras Ja, Polak Ma, Penlidis A. Constitutive Modeling of Damage Evolution in Semicrystalline Polyethylene. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology.2010;132:41009-21.

Barker MB, Bowman J, Bevis M. The performance and causes of failure of polyethylene pipes subjected to constant and fluctuating internal pressure loadings. Journal of Materials Science. 1983;18:1095–1118.

Choi BH, Chudnovsky A, Paradkar R, Michie W, Zhou Z, Cham PM. Experimental and theoretical investigation of stress corrosion crack (SCC) growth of polyethylene pipes. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2009;94:859–67.

Duan HF, Ghidaoui MS,. Tung YK. Energy Analysis of Viscoelasticity Effect in Pipe Fluid Transients. Journal of Applied Mechanics. 2010;77:44503-07.

Bozorg-Haddad A, Iskander M. Comparison of accelerated compressive creep behavior of virgin HDPE using thermal and energy approaches. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. 2011;20:1219–29.

Adib A, Domínguez C, García RA, Garrido MA, Rodríguez J. Influence of specimen geometry on the slow crack growth testing of HDPE for pipe applications. Polymer Testing. 2015;48:104–10.

Alzerreca M, Paris M, Boyron O, Orditz D, Louarn G, Correc O. Mechanical properties and molecular structures of virgin and recycled HDPE polymers used in gravity sewer systems, Polymer Testing. 2015;46:1–8.

Grigoriadou I, Paraskevopoulos KM, Chrissafis K, Pavlidou E, Stamkopoulos TG, Bikiaris D. Effect of different nanoparticles on HDPE UV stability. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2011;96:151–63.

Hoàng EM, Lowe D. Lifetime prediction of a blue PE100 water pipe. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2008;93:1496–503.

Devilliers C, Laiarinandrasana L, Fayolle B, Gaudichet-Maurin E. Characterisation of aged HDPE pipes from drinking water distribution : investigation of crack depth by Nol ring tests under creep loading. Fracture of materials and structures from micro to macro scale - ECF 18 Germany. 2010: 8 p.

Douminge L. Etude du comportement du polyéthylène haute densité sous irradiation ultraviolette ou sollicitation mécanique par spectroscopie de fluorescence. Thesis of université de la rochelle. 2010.

Fayolle B, Audouin L, Verdu J. Oxidation induced embrittlement in polypropylene - a tensile testing study. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2000; 70:333–40.

Lemaitre J. A Continuous Damage Mechanics Model for Ductile Fracture. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology. 1985;107:83–89.

Cárdenas NO, Machado IF, Gonçalves E. Cyclic loading and marine environment effects on the properties of HDPE umbilical cables. Journal of Materials Science. 2007;42:6935–41.

Thang BQ, Dubuc J, Bazergui A, Biron A. Cumulative fatigue damage under strain-controlled conditions. Journal of Materials. 1971;6: 718–37.

Lemaitre.J, Desmorat R. Engineering Damage Mechanics. Book. 2005.

Besson J. Continuum Models of Ductile Fracture: A Review. International Journal of Damage Mechanics. 2010;19:3-52

Miner M. Cumulative damage in fatigue. Journal of Applied Mechanics.1945;12;159-64.

Gatts R. Application of a cumulative damage concept to fatigue. Journal of basic Engineering.1961;83:529-34.

Manson SS. Interpretive report on cumulative fatigue damage in the low cycle range. Welding Journal Research Supplement.1964:9 p.

Bui-Quoc T, Dubuc J, Bazergui A, Biron A. Cumulative fatigue damage under stress-controlled conditions. Journal of basic Engineering. 1971;93:691–98.

Bathias C, Pineau A. Fatigue of Materials and Structures. Book. 2013.

Marshall J. An Introduction to Reliability and Life Distributions Module. Product Excellence using 6 Sigma Module, Reliability and Life distributions. 2012:1–38.

O. Cronvall, Structural lifetime, reliability and risk analysis approaches for power plant components and systems. Book. 2011.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-26

How to Cite

[1]
F. Majid and M. Elghorba, “Critical lifetime of HDPE pipes through damage and reliability models”, J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 5228–5241, Sep. 2019.